Independent forensic audit of strategies — we re-check the receipts

We don’t trade.We audit thosewho promise profit.

Pretty numbers die on the stand.

Before you invest in someone’s “holy grail”, find out whether it survives an honest stand — with real trading costs and a check that it wasn’t just tuned to fit the past. Before you lose your deposit. The verdict is sealed in Bitcoin (a tamper-proof timestamp anyone can check).

How we test See the cases

The gap is what we expose

Autopsy of a grail

Watch a beautiful number die on the stand

18 seconds: they promise +115.9% — on an honest stand, only +5.8% remains. Works sound-off.

How we test →

The stakes

We tested 18 of our own strategies. None survived. How long will the one you’re being sold last?

A strategy that borrows 15–20× your money to bet bigger loses the whole deposit in one bad week. An audit costs $2,500 — cheaper than one mistake.

measured

dead

survived

real money risked

How we proved it →

What we find when we measure

“115.9% in six months, barely a dip”

≈ 5.8% a year, no leverage

A buy-and-hold trade that pockets the funding fee · 1,199 days of real data · the edge is thin and mostly gone, and the deposit barely sank (1.92%)

“wins 68% of trades, big winners”

wins 29–47% of trades; for every $1 it loses it makes ≤ $1.91

A popular indicator strategy (SuperTrend) · 1,289 days · loses even at zero fees

All cases →

This is how we do it

The claim

A strategy, signal, bot or equity screenshot — anything that promises profit.

The stand

Real data and costs — fees and slippage (the gap between the expected and the real fill price) — plus checks that the result wasn’t tuned to fit the past or cherry-picked from many tries.